The Vietnamese treat Cambodians as fools

Concise Dictionary of International Politics pp 1-392 | Cite as

  • Manfred Görtemaker
  • Werner Pfeifenberger
  • Gerhard Kiersch
  • Paul Noack
  • Gerhard W. Wittkamper
  • Franz Ansprenger
  • Dieter Mahncke
  • Werner Jackering
  • Jürgen Domes
  • Dieter Kastrup
  • Heinz Krekeler
  • Gernot Volger
  • Hanns Diether Dammann
  • Wolf-Dieter Karl
  • Uwe Andersen
  • Hildegard Niesmann
  • Wichard Woyke
  • Klaus-Ulrich Nieder
  • Dieter Grosser
  • Erwin Haeckel
  • Hans-Jürgen Puhle
  • Arno Klönne
  • Johannes Kramer
  • Karl Markus Circle
  • Wilfried Loth
  • Ludwig Bress
  • Gerhard Wettig
  • Wolfram Kuschke
  • Ulrich Albrecht
  • Dieter Dettke
  • Klaus-Dieter Schwarz
  • Dirk Standop
  • Rudiger Robert
  • Alois Riklin
  • Ursula Braun
  • Theo summer
  • Reinhold Roth
  • Jochen Bethkenhagen
  • Heinz Meyer
  • Lothar Ruehl
  • Sigmar Fischer
  • Helga Haftendorn
  • Jens Hacker
  • Otto Matzke
Part of the Uni-Taschenbücher book series (UT23, volume 702)

Summary

term - ARP. comprises the totality of measures that are suitable for controlling, limiting and reducing existing military power potentials, both with regard to offensive and defensive weapon systems and with regard to the industrial and technological capacities that enable the development and production of military means. The ideal goal of the ARP. is an unarmed society in which conflicts are resolved peacefully and not through armed violence. ARP. thus stands in opposition to a policy of rearmament, the advocates of which believe that the best way to achieve security and safeguard interests is to establish a position of military strength. Within the concept of the ARP. gradations are possible which indicate the different levels on which ARP. can move: Arms control is the area in which interventions in existing armaments potentials are least extensive. An arms control policy only helps to make arms development more rational, to channel it, to free it from unnecessary risks and to create mechanisms that prevent a war from unintentionally breaking out due to misunderstanding, human error or technical defect. With a policy of Armaments limitation or Arms restriction a framework for armaments development is agreed that only permits further armaments to a limited extent or that “freezes” development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

literature

  1. Görtemaker, Manfred: The unholy alliance. The history of détente 1943–1979, Munich 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Hallgarten, George W.F .: The arms race. Its history to the present, Frankfurt / M. 1967. Google Scholar
  3. Kissinger, Henry A .: Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. With an introduction by Helmut Schmidt, Munich and Vienna 1974. Google Scholar
  4. Senghaas, Dieter: deterrence and peace. Studies on the Critique of Organized Peacefulness, Frankfurt / M. 1972. Google Scholar
  5. Vilmar, Fritz: Armament and disarmament in late capitalism. A socio-economic analysis of militarism, Reinbek 1973.Google Scholar
  6. World Armaments and Disarmament. SIPRI Yearbook, ed. from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm (annually) .Google Scholar
  7. Christ, Carl Q .: Defining International Aggression, the search for World Peace - A documentary History and Analysis, 2 volumes, New York 1975. Google Scholar
  8. Fitzmaurice, Gerald: The Future of Public International Law and of the International Legal System in the Circumstances of Today, International Relations, London, Volume V, 1975. Google Scholar
  9. Friedmann, Wolfgang: The Changing Structure of International Law, New York 1964.Google Scholar
  10. Kimminich, Otto: Development tendencies of contemporary international law, Munich 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Meier, Gerd: The concept of armed attack, Archive of International Law, 4th issue, Tübingen 1975.Google Scholar
  12. walnut, Arthur: History of International Law, Munich 1960.Google Scholar
  13. Schwarzenberger, Georg: International Law, Volume II, The Law of Armed Conflict, London 1968.Google Scholar
  14. International Military Tribunal, The Trial of the Main War Criminals Nuremberg 1947.Google Scholar
  15. Bracher, Karl Dietrich: Critical considerations on the primacy of foreign policy, in: Factors of political decision, Festgabe für Ernst Fraenkel, edited by Gerhard A. Ritter and Gilbert Ziebura, Berlin 1963, pp. 115–148.Google Scholar
  16. Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (Ed.): The anachronistic sovereignty. On the relationship between domestic and foreign policy, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 1, Köln / Opladen 1969.Google Scholar
  17. Hutter, Joachim: Introduction to international politics, Stuttgart / Berlin etc. 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Krippendorff, Ekkehart (Ed.): International Relations, Cologne 1973.Google Scholar
  19. Macridis, Roy C. (Ed.): Foreign Policy in World Politics, 3rd ed., Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey) 1976. Google Scholar
  20. Ziebura, Gilbert; Sprinkler, Franz; Kiersch, Gerhard (Ed.): Determining factors of foreign policy in the second half of the 20th century, Berlin 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Buzan, Barry: Internal Restraints on the Use of Force in (ed.) F.S. Northedge: The Use of Force in International Relations, London 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, Bernard C .: Mass Communication and Foreign Policy in (ed.) James N. Rosenau: Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, New York 1967.Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, Bernhard C .: The Public’s Impact on Foreign Policy, Boston 1973. Google Scholar
  24. Chicago Council on Foreign Relations: American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1975, Chicago 1975.Google Scholar
  25. Noack, Paul: public opinion and foreign policy in (ed.) Hans Peter Schwarz: Handbook of German foreign policy, Munich 1974.Google Scholar
  26. Steinert, Marlies: Public Opinion in Foreign Decisional Process: Historical Dimension (paper, presented at the congress of the IPS A 1976.Google Scholar
  27. Arndt, Hans-Joachim: The plan as an organizational figure and the strategic planning. PSV 9 (1968) .Google Scholar
  28. Buchheim, Hans: Foreign Policy and Planning. PSV 9 (1968), 166-176. Google Scholar
  29. Grewe, Wilhelm G .: Planning in Foreign Policy. Pp. 355–379 in Joseph H. Kaiser (ed): Planning I. 1965.Google Scholar
  30. Obermayer, Klaus: The plan as an administrative law institute in: VVdDST. 18, 1960. Google Scholar
  31. Ophuls, Carl Friedrich: The European Community Treaties as Planning Constitutions in: Kaiser (ed) Planning I. Report of the Committee on Representional Services Overseas Appointed by the Prime Minister under Chairmanship of Lord Plowden, London 1964, Misc. No 5. Google Scholar
  32. Rothstein, Robert L .: Planning, Prediction and Policymaking in Foreign Affairs. Boston 1972.Google Scholar
  33. Schnippenkötter, Swidbert: Planning in foreign policy, p. 161 ff. In commemorative publication Peter Pfeiffer: From the school of diplomacy. 1965. Google Scholar
  34. Weizsacker, Carl Friedrich von: About global political prognoses: P. 483 ff in Uwe Nerlich (ed): War and peace in the modern world of states. Contributions of the Social Science II. 1966.Google Scholar
  35. Wittkamper, Gerhard W .: Analysis and planning in administration and economy. Bonn-Bad Godesberg 1972, also the same: Planning in the FRG: pp. 273–278 in: Gert v. Eynern (ed): Dictionary of political economy. 1973. Google Scholar
  36. Scientific services of the German Bundestag: Planning in politics and administration in the Federal Republic of Germany. Bibliography No. 30, 1972. Google Scholar
  37. Charlesworth, James C. (Ed.): Contemporary Political Analysis, New York 1967.Google Scholar
  38. Dormann, Manfred: Factors of Foreign Policy Decision, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 12 (June 1971), S, 14–28.Google Scholar
  39. Frankel, Joseph: The Foreign Policy Decision, Cologne 1965.Google Scholar
  40. Naschold, Frieder: Decision theories in: Narr-Naschold, Introduction to Modern Political Theory, Vol. 2, System Control, Stuttgart / Berlin 1969, pp. 30–77.Google Scholar
  41. Snyder, Richard C .; Bruck, H.W .; Sapin, Burton: Foreign Policy Decision-Making. An approach to the study of international politics, Glencoe 1962.Google Scholar
  42. Sprinkler, Franz: The liberation policy of the OAU 1963 to 1975, Munich / Mainz 1975.Google Scholar
  43. Cabral, Amilcar: The Revolution of the Damned, Berlin 1974.Google Scholar
  44. Gibson, Richard: African Liberation Movements, London etc. 1972.Google Scholar
  45. Harkabi, Yehoshafat: Israel and Palestine, Stuttgart 1974.Google Scholar
  46. Kimminich, Otto: Protection of people in armed conflicts; for the further development of international humanitarian law. Munich and Mainz 1979. Google Scholar
  47. Quant, William B. et al: The Politics of Palestinian Nationalism, Berkeley etc. 1973.Google Scholar
  48. Pierson-Mathy, Paulette: Les Luttes de Liberation en Afrique Australe au Regard du Droit International, in: Cahiers du Libre Examen 1972.Google Scholar
  49. Scharffenorth, Gerta; Huber, Wolfgang (Hrsg.): Bibliography in: Neue Bibliographie zur Friedensforschung, Stuttgart / Munich 1973.Google Scholar
  50. Tomato, Christian: The liberation movements in the United Nations, in: VN 1974 pp. 65,110.Google Scholar
  51. This article is the revised version of an article by the same author in the United Nations Handbook (Ed. Wolfrum et al.) Munich 1977. It was printed with the kind permission of the Verlag Dokumentations, München.Google Scholar
  52. The Berlin Regulation: The Four Power Agreement on Berlin and the Supplementary Agreements. Edited by the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, Bonn 1971.Google Scholar
  53. Catudal, Honoré M .: The Diplomacy of the Quadripartite Agreement on Berlin. A New Era in East-Westpolitics, Berlin 1978.Google Scholar
  54. Gablentz, Otto M. von der; Kuhn, HansW .; Mettenheim, Carl F. von (Ed.): Documents on the Berlin question 1944–1966, 3rd edition, Munich 1967.Google Scholar
  55. hacker, Jens: The controversial status of Berlin, in: Partnership with the East, Munich 1976.Google Scholar
  56. Hennig, Ottfried: The federal presence in West Berlin. Development and legal character, Cologne 1976.Google Scholar
  57. Keiderling, Gerhard; Stulz, Percy: Berlin 1945–1968. On the history of the capital of the GDR and the independent political unit West Berlin, Berlin (East) 1970.Google Scholar
  58. Mahncke, Dieter: Berlin in divided Germany, Munich and Vienna 1973.Google Scholar
  59. Nawrocki, Joachim: Focus Berlin. Political and economic realities, Cologne 1971.Google Scholar
  60. Riklin, Alois: The Berlin problem. Historical-political and international legal representation of the four-power status, Cologne 1964.Google Scholar
  61. Rshewski, Juri: West Berlin. A political structure sui generis, Moscow n.d.Google Scholar
  62. Schiedermair, Hartmut: The international legal status of Berlin after the Four Power Agreement of September 3, 1971, Berlin / Heidelberg / New York 1975.Google Scholar
  63. Honest, Paul R .; Honest, Anne H .: Population development and environmental crisis. Frankfurt / M. 1972Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, Gordon R .: The suicide program. Frankfurt / M. 1971. Google Scholar
  65. Documents of the Third World Population Conference 1974 in Bucharest: “Recent Population Trends and Future Prospects” (E / CONF. 60/3), Bucharest, 19. – 30. August 1974 and World and Regional Population Prospects (E / CONF. 60 / CBP / 15, dated April 16, 1974). Google Scholar
  66. Borisov, IF. and Koloskov: Soviet-Chinese relations, 1945–1970, German East Berlin 1973.Google Scholar
  67. Brzezinski, Zbigniew: The Soviet Block: Unity and Conflict, Cambridge, Mass. 1960. Google Scholar
  68. Doolin, Dennis J .: Territorial Claims in the Sino-Soviet Conflict: Documents and Analysis, Stanford 1965.Google Scholar
  69. Glaubitz, Joachim: China and the Soviet Union: Building and Disintegrating an Alliance, Hanover 1973.Google Scholar
  70. Griffith, William E .: Sino-Soviet Relations 1964-65, Cambridge, Mass. 1967. Google Scholar
  71. The polemic about the general line of the international communist movement, Verlag für foreign-language literature, Beijing 1965.Google Scholar
  72. Pommerening, Horst: The Sino-Soviet Border Conflict: The Legacy of Unequal Treaties, Olten / Freiburg LB. 1968. Google Scholar
  73. Treadgold, Donald W. (Eds): Soviet and Chinese Communism, Seattle 1967.Google Scholar
  74. Zagoria, Donald S .: The Sino-Soviet Conflict, 1956–61, Princeton 1962 (German edition 1964). Google Scholar
  75. Documentation on the question of Germany, compiled by Dr. Heinrich von Siegler, Verlag für Zeitarchive, Bonn-Vienna-Zurich.Google Scholar
  76. Texts on Germany policy, published by the Federal Ministry for Internal German Relations, Bonn 1967 ff. Google Scholar
  77. hacker, Jens: Germans among themselves - politics with the basic contract, Stuttgart 1977.Google Scholar
  78. Münch, Ingo von (Ed.): Documents of the divided Germany, Stuttgart 1968.Google Scholar
  79. Vogelsang, Thilo: The divided Germany, Munich 1966.Google Scholar
  80. Cambon, Jules: Le Diplomate, Paris 1926.Google Scholar
  81. Iklé, Fred Charles: How Nations Negotiate, New York 1964.Google Scholar
  82. Krekeler, Heinz L .: Die Diplomatie, Munich 1965.Google Scholar
  83. Nicolson, Sir Harold: Diplomacy, London c31963. Google Scholar
  84. Satow, Sir Ernest: A guide to diplomatic practice, London 41975. Google Scholar
  85. Goodrich, Leland M .: The United Nations in a Changing World, New York and London 1974.Google Scholar
  86. Mangon, Gerard J. (Ed.). UN Administration of Economic and Social Programs, New York and London 1966. Google Scholar
  87. Sharp, Walter R .: The United Nations Economic and Social Council, New York and London 1969.Google Scholar
  88. Yearbook of the United Nations, Volume 26 (1972), New York 1975. Google Scholar
  89. (with further references to the general literature on elite research) Google Scholar
  90. Beyme, Klaus von: The political theories of the present, 1972.Google Scholar
  91. Brzezinski, Zbigniew: Society and the world of states in the technotronic age, in: EA 25/1970, pp. 845 ff. Google Scholar
  92. Czempiel, Ernst-Otto: The Citizen in the Interdependent World, in: Open World No. 103 / 1975.Google Scholar
  93. Kaack, Heino; Roth, Reinhold: The foreign policy elite of the Federal Republic of Germany, “from politics and contemporary history” B 3 / 72.Google Scholar
  94. Köser, Helmut: Democracy and elite rule. The elite problem in democratic theory. P. 149 ff. In Oberndörfer / Jäger (ed): The new elite. 1975. Google Scholar
  95. Röhrich, Wilfried: Democratic elite rule. Traditional holdings of a social science problem. 1975. Google Scholar
  96. Siebel Introduction to systematic sociology. 1974. Google Scholar
  97. Steinkemper, Bärbel: Classical and political bureaucrats in the ministerial administration of the Federal Republic of Germany. 1974. Google Scholar
  98. Gaunt, Wolfgang: Petroleum and international politics, Munich 1975.Google Scholar
  99. Hamilton, Adrian; Tugendhat, Christopher: Oil, the biggest business, Eyre London 1975. Google Scholar
  100. Lovins, Amory: World Energy Strategies, Friends of Earth Inc., New York 1975.Google Scholar
  101. Sprinkler, Franz: Dissolution of the Colonial Empires, 3rd edition, Munich 1977.Google Scholar
  102. Bohnet, Michael (Ed.): The north-south problem, conflicts between industrialized and developing countries, 3rd edition, Munich 1974.Google Scholar
  103. Naini, Ahmad: Analysis of the topics and results of the Third World Trade Conference, Hamburg 1972.Google Scholar
  104. Prebish, Raoul: For a better future in developing countries, Berlin 1967.Google Scholar
  105. Senghaas, Dieter (Ed.): Imperialism and structural violence. Analysis of dependent reproduction, Frankfurt / M. 1972. ders .: Peripheral Capitalism. Analysis of addiction and underdevelopment, Frankfurt / M. 1974. Google Scholar
  106. Brandt, Willy: Peace Policy in Europe, Frankfurt 1968.Google Scholar
  107. Adhesive mandrel, Helga: An attempt at a theory of détente, in: Sicherheitsppolitik heute, Issue 2/1975, pp. 223–242.Google Scholar
  108. Yegorov, Valerie N .: Peaceful coexistence and revolutionary process, Berlin 1972.Google Scholar
  109. Kissinger, Henry A .: The United States' détente doctrine. Declaration by the American Secretary of State, Henry A. Kissinger, before the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee on September 19, 1974 on the policy towards the Soviet Union, printed in: Europa-Archiv, Volume 20, 1974, D 463 et seq. Google Scholar
  110. Kuznetsov, Wladlen: International policy of détente from a Soviet perspective, Vienna 1975.Google Scholar
  111. Willms, Bernhard: Relaxation and peaceful coexistence, Munich 1974.Google Scholar
  112. Voslensky, Michael S .: The doctrine of peaceful coexistence in: Haftendorn Helga (Ed.): Theory of international politics, Hamburg 1975, pp. 173–199.Google Scholar
  113. Cell woman, Gerda (Ed.): Approach, demarcation and peaceful change in Europe, Boppard 1976.Google Scholar
  114. Buttner, Friedemann (Ed.): Social progress through development aid? Munich 1972.Google Scholar
  115. Havemann, A .; Kraus, W. (Ed.): Handbook for international cooperation, Baden-Baden, various years.Google Scholar
  116. Kebschull, Lockpick; Fasbender, Karl; Naini, Ahmad: Development Policy. An introduction, 3rd revised, and exp. Ed., Opladen 1976. Google Scholar
  117. Mahbub ul Haq: New regulation of the international transfer of resources, in: Financing and Development, No. 3 / 1975.Google Scholar
  118. Myrdal, Gunnar: Political Manifesto on World Poverty, Frankfurt a.M. 1970.Google Scholar
  119. The Pearson Report. Inventory and proposals for development policy. Report of the Commission for International Development, Vienna, Munich, Zurich 1969.Google Scholar
  120. Bohnet, Michael (Ed.): The North-South Problem. Conflicts between industrialized and developing countries, Munich, 3rd ed. 1974.Google Scholar