What is your trusted free software

Thu-FOSS

Competition needs free software

The extensive use of software often causes a lock-in effect. In the case of proprietary software, this extends not only to individual products, but also to the respective provider. In extreme cases, this reduces competition to the selection of a licensed dealer.

The use of proprietary software therefore promotes monopoly formation - with all the negative consequences for customers. This not only applies to “off the shelf software” (such as the operating system or word processing), but also to custom applications.

When using Free Software, customers can decide anew with each purchase, with each work package, who to commission. He always has the opportunity to choose the most competent, cheapest or otherwise most suitable provider.

Synergy needs free software

Similar organizations have similar requirements for the software used, which is why it is advantageous to work together. Since proprietary software forbids further developments by customers, it limits collaboration to the exchange of experiences. This is not unimportant, but only part of the possibilities.

With Free Software, collaboration can take on a whole new dimension. Institutions can join forces and jointly undertake further developments that are required. These cooperations can come together depending on the product, interests and possibilities.

The "unplanned collaboration" is also very interesting. This means that institutions that were not involved in the original development of a software can still use it. If you need improvements and have them implemented, these will also benefit everyone else. This creates a synergetic effect in which all users of a software mutually benefit from the needs-driven further development of the others.

Such collaborations are at best uncommon with proprietary software and only possible if the manufacturer of the software allows it.

Free software needs self-determination

The requirements for the IT infrastructure of large organizations are very extensive and fulfilling them is a correspondingly demanding task.

Proprietary software makes this unnecessarily difficult with its lack of flexibility. The selection of functions / features, the design of expansion options, the license fees and conditions, the expiry of support - these and many other decisions are made by the manufacturer in accordance with his own interests. Having to keep these in mind on an ongoing basis hinders the design of your own technical infrastructure.

With Free Software it would be possible, for example, to influence the development in a mostly existing community process, to carry out or commission your own further developments, to try out and disseminate them at will or to freely choose the provider of support services. Only this independence from the particular interests of third parties allows a self-determined IT infrastructure.