Any technology jobs are considered workers
A Radically Blessed World Part 1
Share this document
Share or embed the document
Do you think this document is useful?
Automation, technology, and the
Creation of jobs for everyone
Charles Hugh Smith
Translated by Jonee Tiedemann
Table of Contents
Part 1: Why the current system
Chapter 1: gaping holes in the conventional one
Why do we reject new solutions?
My personal path to the solution
What is easy, but guaranteed to fail: wishful thinking
Three starting points
Automation, jobs, and guaranteed
The third industrial revolution
Human labor is the $ 450 solution
Automation is the $ 45 alternative
The weaknesses and flaws of guaranteed income
Automation commodifies work, goods and
Services, and lowers profit
The rising cost of human labor
The system cannot solve the problems of automation
Poverty is more than material
Growth is not a sustainable or positive model
The knowledge economy and cognitive capitalism
The limits of the knowledge economy and cognitive
Summary of the knowledge economy
Questions to be asked
The future belongs to meaningful work
Money creation and distribution are an integral part
for meaningful work and comprehensive wealth accumulation
Chapter 2: A Brief Lesson on Systems, Hierarchy,
The author's dilemma: a thick doorstop from a book
or a summary?
What are systems?
Incentives and deterrents
The rubber break economy: self-interest is not
Half-truths cause incoherence, and distrust
The protection of privileges brings systems to the
Comparison of centralized hierarchies and network organizations
How systems encourage self-destructive behavior
Let's design two work cycles
Let us have two systems for filling
The flow of information in systems
Centralized hierarchies optimize politics and the
Distortion of information
The disadvantages of hierarchy
The subprime mortgage crisis / housing bubble and
The failure of incremental reforms
The historical context of the current world system
Chapter 3: Scarcity, Productivity, and Privilege
Artificial scarcity and stagnation
Which capabilities are centralized through
Monopoly is the perfection of the centralized hierarchy
What is scarcity?
Systems that do not rely on the protection of privileges
Chapter 4: Centralized Money, Wealth, and the
Subversion of democracy
The monopoly of money creation and increasing
How money is distributed in the centralized banking system
An example of pyramidal wealth in the centralized
Chapter 5: The Limits of the Market and the State
The market and the state are no solution for
Automation and growth reduction (degrowth)
The solution of the market for the oversupply
The limits of maximizing personal
Making a profit versus maximizing the
The state enforces negligent behavior (moral hazard)
Those who benefit from the current system stand
before a profound choice
Until recently, millions of us thrived on one
Way, from previous generations only
dreamed. I don't mean owning villas here,
Yachts, or buying political power me
mean, leading an independent life and the
Owning the sources of our prosperity.
This autonomy and this possession is as that
American dream known: the building of
lasting value, through work that is important to you,
on their own terms.
We achieved this prosperity without the benefits of one
Education at elite universities or an inheritance. With
in other words, comprehensive prosperity did not come through
Privilege, or genius, or luck, but through
The system itself revealed these possibilities.
It took millions of us.
A leap into the present day shows that the
Times have changed: the opportunities of the younger
Past are distant memories. We all feel this
but we do not know how this new poverty occurs
Ways to be fixed can not be just to just
just keep going but be lord of your own
To be work.
The defenders of the current order claim
that this decline is temporary and that it is small
Reforms can fix anything that's broken.
Yet their denial doesn't change the reality of that
Wages and salaries have stagnated for decades, all the while
wealth inequality increased enormously. I will you
do not get bored with statistics, but everyone who knows the
Percentage of work in business is earned
Income with inflation adjustment, or other
Parameter of inequality, sees that this is no
Temporary unlucky streak is: The system itself is broken.
Even the defenders do not deny the global ones
Effects of automation on human
Work, or the increasing demands on the
Earth's resources while 7 billion people
a consumption of food, energy, living space
and strive to transport the (western) middle class.
Optimists believe that solar energy will soon be more
or will be less free for all, but that does not mean
that the oceans, deprived of all life, simply come up
magical way to be restored, or that the
Forests that have been cut down for the cultivation of animal feed
can be replaced by artificial trees. The
Refusal to recognize planetary boundaries is called
not that these will go away.
Automation software, robotics and artificial
Intelligence (A.I.) is increasingly replacing everywhere
human labor, and not just labor with less
professional qualification. Like the technology visionary
Marc Andreessen famously noted software
eats up the world. More precisely, software eats up
paid work, every day in greater and greater
This destruction of work becomes non-work
Utopia, we are told, is paid for by taxes
the owner of software and robots. When we
however, look at the numbers as we see in the first chapter
well then we discover that this is unfounded
Bullshit is the worst kind of magical thinking.
Not a single wishful thinker who can see the miracles of the
guaranteed income for everyone in a non-work
Proclaimed society has only a ridiculous one
Felt pen sketch presented where this money came from
real sources, such as corporate profits and
Tax revenue, should come from.
When it comes to our socio-economic system
to understand, then we are like fish in the water: we
cannot imagine any other system than that which
we inhabit. We assume it's not just that
only system, but that it is the best system.
Whatever flaws it has, it has in the
Works fine in the past and it will be fine in the past
Work in the future.
This is proven to be wrong. Instead of it being about
Centuries perfected, our system is one
Rubbish dump of history: junk that was left to
Plagues to survive, wars and revolutions. If
let's look at this from a new perspective, then
this rubble dump makes absolutely no sense. The
System was not designed to be consistent
so it's no wonder it's incoherent. How could
will it be different?
The current system is based on five principles, of
whom we assume to be something like socio-economic gravity, that is, they are
Money created by banks trickles down
down to create work and wealth for all.
Technology creates more jobs than it does through
Automation will be destroyed.
Centralization is the solution for serious ones
Growing debt and consumption (i.e. growth) is
the way to prosperity.
The maximization of private profits organizes the
Economy for the benefit of all.
If we look at these premises with new eyes,
then we see that they are all just wishful thinking. All
five are proven to be untrue. Instead of them the
The basis for a coherent system are added together
from them even more incoherence. Instead of them being a
Solution, each of them is a toxic problem
which is increasingly eroding the system from within.
What does this system failure mean for us as
Individuals and households? Let's clarify right at the beginning
everyone who has a better future for himself and his family
will have to begin his fate in like never before
to take your own hand.
However, dealing with one is
failing system to our individual destinies
to improve is no longer sufficient. Even the
Few who can afford forts on islands
to buy soon we will discover the
Consequences of the failure of our present
Systems all share. Once the oceans are without
Are life, then they are for everyone, not just for them
The real solution is obvious, isn't it? We
need a new system. We all feel it, but we do
don't know where to start Let's start with
a simple question: how about if we could hit the reset button what the way we like
When it comes to creating money, work, business and
Community? If we could start over, what
would we edify? This is not a bad question because
technology now allows us to use that reset button
to press and organize the money creation,
Work, business and community in new ways
When we set out to create a system
which everyone the chance to control his
own sources of prosperity there, how would such one
System look like?
If this is a question you're interested in (and if it's
shouldn't interest us all, then we have all
related problems), then read on. This book
presents a comprehensive, complete solution to the global
The key point is no secret: man
must understand how systems work.
Systems have inputs, rules, and outputs
(Outputs). If we just eat gummy buns and
never do sports, then we get sick because
our bodies are a system:
Gummibrchen + no sport = bad health and
Our current one creates in a similar way
Economic, social and political system insufficient
economic, social and political results.
To quote a popular definition of insanity here:
Madness is when the inputs are the same and
different results are expected. By the
Tastes of the gummy buns and the seating positions
being changed on the sofa does not change anything
End of things (death).
And yet all the reforms that have been presented so far
just as if the variety were gummy cakes
be changed, and you would expect this tiny
Difference has a fundamental impact on ours
We need a totally new system if we can
Results or the outputs / outputs
Inequality, insecurity and the poverty of opportunity
exist in opportunities, secure work and prosperity
want to convert.
This new system does not involve the overthrow of the
existing order, or repairing the
current system. This new system unites
existing technologies and social innovations that
we can all understand. This new system is not
utopian; it's extremely convenient. We see every day
Examples of similar systems.
We don't want to keep failing by doing the
Change the taste of our gummy rolls and us
wonder why the results are no different
become. Replace the system with another one and
the outputs, the results, will:
Opportunities and opportunities
Possession of the sources of wealth
There is a world-changing difference between ours
current system and the one here
is described. The present order is from above
down, and to change anything it takes
Wealth and / or political power (if you have the
Has wealth, power can be bought). In this
System, the individual is essentially powerless;
Votes are counted, but the
pyramidal structure remains unchanged.
In the system this is described in the following chapters
Each individual has the power to set up the system for that
Well-being of yourself and that of everyone else
Change involved. Precondition is no longer
to sit on top of the castle. Everyone in the
The current arrangement is powerless in this
empowered new system. Empowered, not just to be
To strive for well-being and that of one's family,
but to improve the community, and thereby the
large community of planet earth.
My book takes up this global challenge
a big embrace, one which the bonds of the
breaks ideological jargon and frees us with it
we find a practical way to become a radically beneficial one
Work out the future. What are we waiting for?
Part 1: Why the Current System
Chapter 1: gaping holes in the
traditional narrative style
This book with its original title Brcken
Across a treacherous flow: New tools for them
Solution to global poverty (Bridging a Treacherous River:
New Tools to Solve Global Poverty) started out as a plan
to alleviate global poverty. It was the kernel of
40 years during which I asked the following simple questions
considered: is poverty inevitable? Unless,
what systemic solution is there, one that is everywhere
alleviate poverty on the globe?
As an inherently practical person, and trained as a
such, I looked for a practical answer.
I found out that we have two kinds of poverty: The
ancient poverty (want), and a new kind, triggered by
Automation and software that eats the world, like
Marc Andreessen put it so appropriately. Digital
Technologies are massively replacing human labor
and wise, and threaten millions with loss of earnings.
Once I understood the main cause of poverty
had the lack of safe and paid work fr
I all realized that my real topic was the
Job creation for anyone who does paid work
wanted was on a global scale. This wasn't just
the solution for global poverty but also for the
increasing replacement of human labor by
While I was figuring out why the only thing possible
Result of the current system poverty and
Inequality is, I understood a few more things
will help us to develop a new system
design which has possibilities for all as a result.
One of them is the fact that state
Capitalism (or whatever you mean the present
Arrangement) is more than an economic one
or financial system; it organizes ours
Relationships with nature and with other people, and
it does so without our being really aware of it
In other words, a financial and economic system
is also a socio-political system concerning
Resource management, by nature. The draft of the
The financial-money-economic system sets the course for everything
Second, the crux of any system of finance and
Economy is the creation of value. When a
small group of people creating value
controlled, then the only possible outcome is the
Systems creating opportunities and poverty
of increasing inequality exactly what that
current system evokes.
By definition, money has value. Those people
which the creation and distribution of value (for
Example money) control, control everything else.
When the way money is created and distributed isn't
is changed, then you really have nothing
changed. You just eat a different color of
Let us assume that a system is broken
as money. I own the only one
Rubble factory and I'm going to jail everyone
trying to become a competing rubber pulp factory
establish. Who do you think will get rich and in this
System be powerful? What is the only possible
Result in this system?
Of course this is an oversimplification, but you understand
my point. Those who create value
control, control everything else. If we don't
How money is created and distributed
change, then nothing changes. We're just changing that
Color of the gums, and wonder why
the results do not change.
Opportunities and opportunities boil down to that
there is an opportunity to create value. If
creating valence from a few few above
is controlled on the pyramid, then the majority becomes
have a lack of opportunity. Such a system
does not allow any other result.
Of course we are all for freedom. Only despots and
Dictators are against freedom. But freedom is without it
Possibility of creating value an illusion. What
exactly means freedom in a system where the
Creation of value and possibilities of one
limited to a few at the expense of the majority?
Chairman Mao Tse-tung alleged
famously that political power from the end
comes from cannon barrels. The power of coercion comes
from the end of a cannon barrel, but it is not
the same as political power, or the power to do things
take care of.
In the end, Mao was wrong. Cooperation is the basis
of power. The comrade with the cheeky Mao cap and
the rifle can have any power out of the end
the barrel only stops as long as he keeps the rifle on
judges those who have no rifles. Coercion is a very
limited form of power. Coercion does not create
Value, cooperation creates value.
We can only evaluate what we can measure. If
if we cannot measure it, then it does not exist. If
we talk about inequality, then we talk
ultimately about money, because money is what we can measure.
The bottom line of measuring inequality through money
the idea is that if we give people a little bit more money
that inequality would be reduced.
But inequality doesn't really exist because of that
Money. Inequality is about who is creating
Validity controls and who has the opportunity to value
create. If people are given money, then they are
While this reduces the guilt of those on top of that
sit on the pyramid, but that doesn't really change the
Inequality of the system. It can be the silence of those
buy who are denied the opportunity to
but this does nothing to change the causes of inequality.
Since we don't measure the causes of inequality,
we don't even recognize them. When we are a person
withhold the opportunity for value creation
to actively do something productive and important
contribute and think that a little money this
Make inequality go away, then we are blind
towards the causes of inequality.
The first step is to realize that money is not
the only and most helpful standard for measurement
of inequality or value. It's not even
an adequate measurement for capital, because the most valuable
Capital is the ability to create value through
free cooperation with others.
The current system is a centralized one
Hierarchy. Centralized hierarchies work great
for those at the top of the pyramid of wealth, power,
Security and Opportunities. The top 10% with the
greatest wealth, most power, security, and with
most of the ways, look down and
say that since the system works for them, it works
for everyone. They stare at the few at the pyramid
climb up to join them as proof
making the system work for everyone who does that stuff
to have: mind, devotion, and so on.
Needless to say, those people deny the
Have wealth and power, so don't let them
anyone else change the system, they could
yes lose their place on top of the pyramid. Since they
Having understanding and devotion etc. can do them without
another endless list of reasons for it
conjure up why the system is good together
and only small reforms are needed.
But whether the top 10% recognize it or not, it
like it or not, the system is unfair. It is
morally corrupt to its very foundations.
But the moral corruption of the system is not that
most pressing problem. The main problem is that
five premises listed in the introduction, and
it is these that decompose the system from within. Ever
The more we obey these five premises, the more
let's select the system.
This leaves us with a choice. We can verify the correctness of the
Systems that work for us as individuals
defend that which enables us to defend our
to maximize private interests. We can
Eat different colored gummy rolls and hope that they will
the system magically saves itself, or we
tackle the matter and design one from scratch
new system, one with opportunities and possibilities for
We are told that there is always a middle ground, but
this is not always true. Sometimes it's either or.
Now let's look at this concept: a system which
works for everyone, works for us too.
Why do we reject new solutions?
Skepticism is generally our first reaction to any new one
Solution. There is more to it than just healthy caution
and we need to understand the psychology of skepticism
if we want to avoid falling into the trap of
Black painting to go.
Skepticism is part of our intellectual immune system
which puts us in front of wishful thinking, fuzzy logic and the
Illusion of understanding protects (i.e. the urge to do everything
wanting to reduce a Power Point presentation).
But skepticism is also a cloak of invisibility.
Black painters find under the disguise of skepticism
extensive deficiencies in the current arrangement,
but even more so in the proposed solutions.
When black painters rule, the system stagnates.
In companies, stagnation leads to bankruptcy. In
Societies stagnation leads to decline
Vitality and the ability to solve problems.
Black painters think they are valuable, yes
Perform heroic task by giving solutions
to weigh. It is thanks to them that through their
Efforts the stupid, the otherwise inappropriate
Taking risks, being saved from oneself.
It doesn't get in their head that they are the greatest
Pose a risk. And yet this is the reality. Nassim
Taleb and others have shown that systems that work
oppose the fermentation of new ideas,
become increasingly brittle and weak. The refusal
of solutions guarantees the system collapse.
One of the predominant reasons for black painting is
our pay and pleasures, our position
and our social status from the danger of new ones
Solutions to protect. Experiments and competition
are a danger to our self-interest, and
we all understand the motivation to do our part in the
Cake from the danger of faster-better-cheaper too
Charity is served, not self-indulgent
Interests but through faster-better-cheaper. If
Experiments and competition are suppressed so
self-serving interests are protected, then rot
the system from within.
Black painting triumphs when idiosyncratic interests
Stand above the common good. It is not
surprising that this devaluation of civic
Virtues in favor of selfishness of maximization
of personal gain at all costs than that
Main reason for the decline and fall of Rome
Black painters find their home in black painting organizations such as bureaucracies and in monopoly positions
Organizations that are there either no to
say (bureaucracies), or those of the elimination of
depend on new solutions (also known as the
It is no coincidence that illicit organizations
are centralized hierarchies. As we did in the second chapter
systems destroy themselves, if
they become large, complex, centralized and hierarchical.
How they self-destruct is very simple:
Innovations, experiments, competition are seen as a danger
suppressed, and so it becomes faster-better-cheaper
comfortingly buried in a shallow grave.
The way up within these organizations is
phenomenally good black painting while one
profuse the undying support for
Innovation announced. Innovation is great as a principle
Of course, but once you get that
self-serving interests attack whatever they, hem, always
does, then she will quickly go to the cemetery of more
Investigations are thrown out necessary.
Black painters do not show their expertise through innovation
but by making holes in the innovations
Do other. Innovation is risky, black painting is
safe especially in organizations that are risky
avoid. The result is that black painters of
Colleagues are praised for having the
Protecting the organization from the danger of innovation.
There is another major motivation for
Black painting. Those who are part of the 10% of the layer of
Technocrats, finance and economics are looking up
their success and think that the system for me and
works for my co-workers so it's obvious
great. The possibility that the system is only for that
the upper 10% is good, or that the success is only temporary,
is not as convincing as personal experience
those who are in black painters' organizations.
In other words, if the system does not work for them personally
works, then she has little reason for it
Black painting. You are interested in solutions and
give them a chance. But those who do well
idiosyncratic interests are protected for many reasons
for painting black and few reasons for
possibly to support disruptive solutions.
In any case, we should be skeptical, but we should
avoid painting black and into stagnation and
to slide the collapse.
My personal path to the solution
This book follows the good advice of the philosopher
Ludwig Wittgenstein: Life's problems are on
insoluble on the surface and can only be solved in depth. In
the superficial dimensions they are insoluble. To
my astonishment has my own convoluted
Career path helped me close the gaping holes
to identify traditional narrative and a
to design a new solution.
Here is a list of my colorful career: a carpenter
and builders, entrepreneurs, employers, political
Activist, volunteer social worker, co-founder of a
Local charitable foundation, manager in
Back room of a small financial research firm
and, more recently, a freelance writer
of little books, blogs and ideas within the digital
Economy. I've built a lot of houses and a lot of books
written, and with a pickaxe I got one
Independent livelihood is hollowed out in the ditches of risk economy.
Steve Jobs held a salutation at Stanford in 2005
University, one which is famous for its hard earned
Wisdom regarding the fact that our careers
only takes off when we reach the point where everything
This book is that point.
Each of my work experiences has something irreplaceable
contributed to this connection of the dots. I should have
not the same analytical tools available,
if even one of them was missing.
It is therefore only too appropriate that I warn you
as to the fact that i while i was young
Man learned the carpentry trade, also a
Studied philosophy. This means that i
every now and then have an irresistible urge to
veiled word such as teleology too
use. I'm not trying to be a mystery here
I try to be concise; sometimes conveyed a
one word a whole rat tail of important ones
Teleology is such a word. It means the end goal who
final point towards what all the things we did
have lead, successes like failures.
Understanding abstractions is essential, and yet not
sufficient. It is not enough to have abstract knowledge;
you have to combine it with down-to-earth experience,
to understand how things really work.
There's another indispensable ingredient: risk.
You can never really understand how things are
work when you don't have your own skin and hair
is included, and that means there is risk.
Do not lose, fail, be rejected
paid for these things sharpen the mind. There are
no substitute for what we learn by ourselves
fight through the problems of the real world and the
Face the consequences.
When we combine abstract knowledge with that from real knowledge
Connect the world, then, if we are lucky, we can
develop an ability to think independently,
They don't just ask questions and find answers from
stem from pre-chewed truisms.
What is easy, but guaranteed to fail:
We all know that people like things
just have. There's a reason we're like that
are predisposed. Calories are in the world of hunters and
Collectors in short supply, and valuable energy in pursuit
There is no point in getting burned from difficult tasks
unless the wages are very large. (Note that
our brains blazing high are the many calories
That's why we prefer wishful thinking to analysis.
Wishful thinking is a lot less work. If
Has the choice, then one chooses wishful thinking because it is
generally less risky than valuable energy in work
to gamble away that may not pay off.
However, when we face difficult problems
face, then wishful thinking is not very much
useful because it does not contain any solutions.
If you run a real business, one
Takes you bankrupt if it solves one
Problem failure, this is where wishful thinking is catastrophic.
There are few guarantees in life but wishful thinking
Wishful thinking cannot do the hard work of analysis,
Experiment, and all that risky waving around
the solution of problems.
So if we really address the problems of poverty and the
Automation that eats our world, want to solve, then
we should roll up our sleeves and get one right
Carry out calorie-consuming analysis. The results
will be worth it.
Three starting points
Before we can start, a new system too
design, we need to understand why the moment
System has failed. Otherwise we will get the same result
to get. Let's start with these three points:
traditional narrative about ours
socio-economic system is so full of holes
that it no longer makes sense.
2. We don't ask the right questions those who really do
must be provided.
3. Systems are not ideological. they work
regardless of our wishes and cannot
repaired by mental or emotional trickery
Although we were supposedly taught to be critical
think, there is surprisingly little independent thinking
which is actually based on the five premises set out in the
Introduction is applied. Why is
that so? There are several reasons for this.
When these narrative styles no longer make sense,
then we have to create new ones. This is a priori
a risky undertaking, because new ways of narrating
can be as inconsistent as the present.
Although we really have no choice here today
Explanations don't make sense whether we like it or not
we don't avoid questioning the status quo,
because when we ask questions, this presupposes
that we accept that the future is in question, and
this uncertainty is a cause for concern.
Another reason why we don't ask the questions
must be asked is the failure of the
Imagination: Few can imagine one of the
present a very different world.
The idea that systems are independent of ideologies
existed by Donella Meadows essay
Leverage points: places where systems are intervened
(Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System, zu
read at donellameadows.org).
Before reading this essay, I accepted that
Conventional narration according to economic and
social systems are ideological: capitalism,
Marxism, democracy, socialism, and so on.
People believed in or rejected the system
for ideological reasons.
That systems are reduced to input, rules and outputs
they cannot do anything with our belief in theirs
Having to do with kindness or efficiency was an enlightenment.
Simply put, systems are successful or they are
fail regardless of our ideological
beliefs about the system.
Though the psychology of belief is complicated, it is
amounts to identity: our belief in the value of one
Systems is a fundamental part of our identity.
We believe in the goodness and righteousness of
subsidized social housing, as an example here because
we to social justice and housing for all
believe. That this is low-income people
does not help, is counter-intuitive and unacceptable: it has to
Helping low income people because we are people
want to help on low incomes.
Similarly, we believe that maximizing
private profit leads the system to prosperity because we
believe in economic freedom. How could anyone
not the good and right of economic freedom
see? That maximizing personal enrichment
the system destroyed is counter-intuitive and unacceptable:
The system must have the greatest private enrichment
Working properly because of self-interest
the core of freedom is.
And so on. Any ideological belief can be based on
be broken down this way.
We defend ourselves against this analysis because it is ours
Identity challenges. No wonder we are
resist: What is more important to our
Self-understanding as those beliefs that ours
Make out identity?
If we understand this, then we can do ours
Separate belief from systems as such. We can
keep our faith and still understand
that the success or failure of the system has nothing to do with
has to do with our own beliefs.
If we want positive results and outputs, then
we need to examine the system as a system, not as a
an expression of our identity and ours
Oddly enough, we insist on systems too
their results support exactly the opposite of that
are what we express because we believe that uncritical
Belief is an expression of our conviction.
This leaves us with quite a blatant choice. Either us
set ourselves the goal of designing a system
produces positive results, or we indulge in
our ideological beliefs. Either
As Donna Meadows points out, systems are often
counterintuitive: we want them to have a certain result
bring forth, but can the rules and the inputs
(Inputs) we choose completely different results
(Outputs) than we expect. If you can
the failure to imagine a world that is different
than the one we live in, it's no wonder
that our systems self-destruct.
The first part of the book has three goals;
the gaping chasms and holes of the
traditional narrative to make it coherent
Asking questions that need to be asked, but
not be asked.
3. Our economy and society as a system
Once we achieve these goals, then we are
prepared to design a system which
actually produces positive results.
Automation, jobs, and guaranteed
In studying what others are trying to solve
I was amazed to have suggested automation
about the fact that I have huge holes in the conventional one
Narrative found in terms of what if
Software and robots huge areas of human
Replace work. The common narrative style (as used by
highly respected economists, academics,
Presented to journalists and public intellectuals
will) is that the inevitable erosion of work through
Automation will have the following results:
The creation of even more jobs than through
the advancing technology get lost; or
A guaranteed minimum income for everyone who pays
by controlling those who the robots and
Own software that eats up all the workstations.
In other words, we don't have to input or
Inputs, or the system, change: the system will do the
general destruction of jobs solve without
that we have to do something differently. It will
automatically create more jobs than destroyed
and the state will collect more taxes and
Pay everyone a minimum income.
That these conclusions are incoherent and ineffective
is obvious to anyone who has experience as a
Entrepreneur and a basic understanding of
Government spending and corporate profits.
Let's start with the idea that technology is becoming more and more
Jobs create as they are destroyed.
There is little evidence that this is so. It could
Have been like that in the past, but not today.
If we were to ask the question, a technology too
call which more in the past decade
Jobs created when they destroyed then is
Biotechnology the typical answer. But only a few
- Can Thai people understand Vietnamese and vice versa
- What are the strangest things people hoard
- What's wrong with the Indian bureaucracy
- Has the culture changed in Japan?
- Who invented smartphones
- What smells the most sexually excites men
- How do you predict bond angles
- What is the capital of Suriname
- What do Amazon employees hate about Amazon
- Why do trampoline players have huge calf muscles
- Have you ever had weed brownies
- Are Canadian women like American women?
- What's your best Indian temple experience
- What are skyscrapers
- Why do exchange rates change all the time
- What does the word sura mean
- What's the worst part about cooking
- Where can I find crossdressers
- Where can I find Visa sponsorship
- Why does someone become a gang member?
- Is where we were a correct sentence
- What can you say about good governance
- What are tech entrepreneurs doing
- Use celebrity Android devices