Which consulting firms hire JDs
Human Resource Management pp 123-133 | Cite as
- Susanna M. Krisor
- Jens Rowold
In companies there are various starting points that must be taken into account if the motivation of the workforce is to be consciously influenced positively. A lack of recognition and a lack of constructive feedback are cited as reasons for low loyalty - topics that have been known and trained in HR work for years (decades), but still seem to be neglected in practical implementation. Motivation theories provide information about which processes and content are motivating. This requires from managers theoretical know-how about motivation, but also time to show the employees interest and empathy.
- Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press, Google Scholar
- Boneva, B. F. I. H., Ferligoj, A., Pauknerová, D., & Orgocka, A. (1998). Achievement, power, and affiliation motives as clues to (e) migration desires: A four-countries comparison. European Psychologist, 3rd(4), 247-254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boonzaier, B., Ficker, B., & Rust, B. (2001). A review of research on the job characteristics model and the attendant job diagnostic survey. South African Journal of Business Management, Dec.(1), 11-34. Google Scholar
- Campbell, J.P., & Pritchard, R.D. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Pp. 63-130). Chicago: Rand McNally, Google Scholar
- Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management (reissue). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gallup (March 20, 2012). Every fourth employee has resigned internally - executives have a duty: Salary and tasks are not decisive for emotional employee loyalty. Consulting firm Gallup publishes Engagement Index 2011. Berlin: Gallup.Google Scholar
- Gunkel, M. (2006). Country-compatible incentive design - A comparison of employees ’performance reward preferences in Germany and the USA. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55 259–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hackmann, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands – resources model to predict engagement: Analyzing a conceptual model. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (Pp. 85-101). New York: Psychology Press, Google Scholar
- Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (Pp. 102-117). New York: Psychology Press, Google Scholar
- Hoch, J. E., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2009). Leading with goals. Report Psychology, 34(7/8), 308-320.Google Scholar
- Hossiep, R., Bittner, J., & Berndt, W. (2008). Employee appraisals. Motivating, effective, sustainable. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Kanning, U. P., & Staufenbiel, T. (2012). Organizational psychology. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Accessed 24 Mar 2015. Google Scholar
- Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McClelland, D.C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40th(7), 812-825. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (November 1, 2003). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). Preliminary Manual. (Utrecht) (Utrecht University, ed.). Department of Social & Organizational Psychology. http://www.beanmanaged.eu/pdf/articles/arnoldbakker/article_arnold_bakker_87.pdf.
- Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. (2005). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Authors and Affiliations
- 1.Technical University DortmundDortmundGermany
- What makes people change forever
- How many overpasses are there in Surat?
- Diabetes can cause female itching
- How can you identify Boeing from Airbus
- High levels of prolactin can lead to depression
- Does lightning affect the WLAN?
- Who are employees
- How did Confucianism come to Japan
- How can you cook smoked meat under pressure?
- Did meditation completely remove your anxious thoughts?
- What do feminists think of Jordan Peterson
- What's wrong with Dubai's economy
- Which iPhone headphones have the best microphone?
- Means single in the 20s failure
- Why am I always betrayed 1
- Do you like Chanel 19
- Who is the highest paid programmer
- Was Thiruvalluvar a Shaivit or a Buddhist
- How can I pray before I sleep?
- Regulation hurts our economy
- Does the time-out work for your toddler
- Can someone have NPD and bipolar
- What is the registration fee for CPT
- How has globalization affected the Philippines